Poor, poor Demi Moore. She was quoted earlier this week in the newspaper as saying:

“There aren’t that many good roles for women over 40. A lot of them don’t have much substance, other than being someone’s mother or wife.”

Wow. So her role in “Striptease” was substantive?
Or her acting in “The Scarlet Letter” was outstanding?

Couldn’t her current lack of success have more to do with the fact that she sucks? And that her movie choices have been poor?

Maybe choosing parts that solely highlighted her physical attributes was not the best strategy for a long term career? Ya think?

(I’m not denying that things get more difficult for female actors as they age, but in the same day’s paper there was an article about Helen Mirren and the four Emmy’s that she just won.)


5 Responses to “”

  1. Jeep2000 Says:

    “Wow. So her role in ‘Striptease’ was substantive?”
    That was good for a Friday laugh!

  2. katearch1978 Says:

    And you can’t forget her role as the Charlie’s-Angel-Gone-Bad in Charlie’s Angels: Full Throttle!

    (I can’t believe I actually just owned up to not only seeing the movie, but remembering the plot!)

  3. Anon E. Mouse Says:

    Yeah, Dame Judith Dench is practically out of work.

  4. diane vespa Says:

    And what is wrong with playing a role as someones wife or Mother?
    Maybe all the plastic surgery she has had rules her out for those roles as well.

  5. idonotknowme Says:

    She got lots of publicity for being a mother-to-be…. when she was naked on the cover of Vanity Fair.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: